A game system is a metaphorical engine that expresses how a designer feels, understands, or frames a real-world activity or concept.
Think of a particular activity—say, fishing. What makes fishing memorable in real life is the emotional rhythm it carries. It begins with **stillness and anticipation**, as you cast your line and wait, surrounded by the gentle quiet of nature. Then comes a sudden shift—**tension**, the sharp pull of a potential catch, breaking the calm and demanding your attention. You engage in a delicate dance—timing, resistance, and adjustment—as you try to reel in whatever's on the line, carefully reeling in, adjusting to the fight of the fish, caught in a moment of focused reflex. Layered into all of this is randomness—the thrilling uncertainty of what you’ve caught. Is it small or massive? Common or rare? Trash or treasure? That unpredictability adds an emotional flavor. Finally, there’s the **payoff**—the satisfaction of the catch, a sense of accomplishment earned through patience and skill. Fishing, in this sense, is less about motion and more about **emotional pacing**: a slow build, a sudden peak, and a reflective release.
As you can see, we've deconstructed fishing not through the lens of precise kinematic skill, but through the unfolding emotional experience—from anticipation to tension, surprise, and satisfaction. Rather than recreating fishing as a literal, physical simulation, a game designer can instead build a system that echoes this emotional arc. We should think of game activities not as realistic replications, but as playable metaphors—systems designed to express meaning, not mimic mechanics. These metaphors resonate not because they are accurate, but because they feel emotionally true.
Not convinced? Chances are you’ve already experienced this design approach countless times. From farming sims to rogue-likes, games rarely aim to replicate reality with precision. Instead, they translate the emotional essence of real-world systems into expressive, interactive forms. Unless you’re building simulation software, abstraction is not a shortcut—it’s a core design strategy.
| Game System | Real-World Analog | What It Actually Simulates | How It's Implemented (Mechanic) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fishing (Stardew Valley) | Fishing | Anticipation, timing, tension, surprise, payoff | Meter timing mini-game, randomized fish pool, visual feedback |
| Crafting (Minecraft) | Making things | Creative recombination, logical transformation | Grid-based recipe system; material placement = new item |
| Cooking (Breath of the Wild) | Culinary preparation | Trial-and-error, discovery, risk-reward | Ingredient selection system with unknown outcomes and bonuses |
| Lockpicking (Skyrim) | Picking locks | Precision, tension, tactile sensitivity | Rotational feedback loop—turnpick resistance + position intuition |
| Hacking (Fallout) | Digital intrusion | Pattern recognition, logic, deduction | Word grid puzzle with limited attempts and elimination logic |
| Survival (Don’t Starve) | Real-world survival | Scarcity, stress, prioritization, improvisation | Hunger, health, sanity meters; fragile inventory + crafting pressure |
| Combat (Undertale) | RPG combat | Moral choice, reflex, empathy vs violence | Bullet hell + turn-based negotiation/dodge system |
| Navigation (Outer Wilds) | Space travel | Wonder, orientation, gravity mastery, scale | Physics-based thrust + orbital mechanics; no map hand-holding |
| Conversation (Disco Elysium) | Social interaction | Inner conflict, persuasion, uncertainty | Dialogue skill checks; internal voices as playable RPG stats |
| Exploration (Journey) | Travel and pilgrimage | Solitude, connection, flow | Minimal UI, fluid movement, multiplayer ambiguity |
Begin by identifying the emotion or thematic experience you want your players to feel—perhaps it’s tension, surprise, satisfaction, or curiosity. For example, you might say, “I want players to feel a slow build of tension followed by a moment of payoff.” Or, you could find a real-world analog that naturally evokes that emotion—something like fishing, cooking, or disarming a trap. Then, break down the emotional arc of that activity: what’s the rhythm? What’s the buildup? What are the turning points? You might map it as: waiting → sudden action → resolution.
You can look to other games to see how they’ve expressed similar emotional flows through mechanics—like how Stardew Valley uses a timing bar to simulate the tension of fishing. . Finally, design your own system that expresses this feeling. It doesn’t have to be literal—it could be a rhythm mini-game, a physics-based interaction, or a time-pressure system—whatever best expresses the emotional truth you’re aiming for.
But here’s the hard part: crafting systems, mechanics, and UI that accurately simulate a feeling is incredibly challenging. It’s not just theory—it requires iteration, prototypes, and playtesting. You’ll need to refine your system until the intended feeling emerges through play. Only then does the mechanic transcend function and become a playable metaphor for your idea.
Thus, Games are more than simulations—they are expressive systems that let players feel, not just act. By designing mechanics around emotion and metaphor, we create experiences that are memorable. We don’t teach players what fishing is—we let them feel what it mean.
In the end, a game designer’s role is not to perfectly reconstruct the world—but to create new ones that speak truthfully to how we experience it. Through the lens of playable metaphor, every mechanic becomes a brushstroke of meaning. By building systems that simulate not action, but emotion, we can create games that don’t just entertain—but express.
Exercises
1. [🟢 Remember] Identify Emotional Arcs in Systems
Choose a real-world activity (e.g., gardening, flying, rock climbing) and write out the emotional arc a person typically experiences from start to finish. Break it down into phases like anticipation, tension, discovery, or payoff.
2. [🟢 Understand] Describe a Playable Metaphor
In your own words, explain what a "playable metaphor" is. Use one example from the table (like fishing or cooking) to show how a game system expresses emotion rather than literal realism.
3. [🔵 Apply] Deconstruct a Mechanic You Love
Pick a mechanic from a game you enjoy. What emotion or experience does it simulate? What real-world activity does it metaphorically reference? Describe how its rules, timing, and interactions bring that feeling to life.
4. [🔵 Analyze] Compare Two Game Systems
Choose two games that simulate the same real-world concept (e.g., survival in Don't Starve vs. Subnautica). How do their mechanics differ in what emotion or message they communicate? What choices did the designers make?
5. [🟠 Evaluate] Critique a Playable Metaphor
Choose a mechanic that attempts to simulate a feeling (e.g., fear, serenity, frustration). Does the system succeed in making the player feel that way? Why or why not? What might you change to make it stronger or more honest?
6. [🔴 Create] Design a Mechanic of Emotion
Invent a game mechanic intended to simulate a specific feeling (e.g., grief, wonder, anxiety). Describe what rules would make that emotion emerge during play. What systems would reinforce it?
7. [🔴 Create] Reimagine a Familiar System
Take a common mechanic (like inventory, health, or dialogue) and reimagine it as a playable metaphor. How would you redesign it to express a different emotional truth?
8. [🔴 Create] Write Your Playable Metaphor Manifesto
Inspired by this essay, write a short paragraph that outlines your personal philosophy on designing emotion-first systems. What kinds of feelings do you want your games to express? What experiences do you want players to carry with them?
/ END OF LOG ENTRY / RETURN TO MAIN SYSTEM /